2024/11/02

About Time, Eh.

Purple cauliflower seedlings that survived my less-than-elegant transplant, from one packet of seeds purchased a few years ago.
Sum total of white cauliflowers from a packet purchased at the same time. :-D

This spring I spent more hours outside than I expected, thanks in part to the cooler temps and periodic rain which kept hay fever down. It's November and this spring I used my meds maybe half a dozen times, which is super extraordinarily amazingly few, in spite of winds upwards of 68km/h in the last week, making 40kms "normal" these days. We also had the fire going three nights in the last ten days, and maybe again this weekend with expected lows of 5C, although forecast is as reliable as astrology this spring; we will run out of firewood at this pace. (November is usually when conscientious shoppers start buying the following winter's firewood.) I'm determined to put in all the seeds I collected/bought in the last few years in the ground, even while accumulating a few more packets of dwarf beans and a couple of zucchinis. And first time ever, peas! If I have to stick stuff in between flowers, so be it!  

Then there is my avoidance of work, in this case overthinking about drafts, because I am so aware I haven't grasped all the information I need about this project. I was coaxed to get back on the loom, however, by a long-time weaver friend, and Ben, and on Thursday, with the wind up again, I went downstairs and started weaving my first proper piece. This worked great because I got some clarity on what I want to do re. drafts/patterns. And though the loom mechanism is still not at its best, (the foot pedal doesn't leak air any more, but sometimes I must press with my heal to drop the shafts, making "walking" awkward,) the weaving feels faster. Or, because I'm not sampling but weaving, I am concentrating on different aspects, and that somehow translates to... the perception of speed.
Colors look glittery, but this is the last part of Thursday's work. I want to use mainly the blue half of the color wheel in the pattern wefts, but other than purple, I have so many more of the yellow half.
Friday's top half; here I was trying to capture how different angles show off different parts of the pattern or color combos clearly. You may think, "Duh, of course," but it's more marked in real life, particularly in what you don't see. In the top photo, for e.g. the you can see more pattern in the yellow weft area than in real life. 

Things I learned:

* Selecting weft colors "on the spot" works. Although I aimed for something of a gradation for the pattern wefts so far, anything has gone on in the tie down. They're lovely to see as I weave, and though they may disappear after the 20/2s bloom, I know they're there, and maybe one day the wearer will, too. 

* Standing up and weaving, I thought of weaving a slightly wider warp. I'd love go bigger if I can. I also toy around with the idea of 20/2 warps with 60/2 wefts; I've woven in this way once or twice, and not only it takes eternity, 60/2s don't full nicely. Still, if I can find a way, and beat loosely, maybe?????

* There was something else seemingly important but not technical I wanted to tell you, but now I can't remember because the technical stuff is easier to put into words, while aesthetic/feeling stuff, not as much. I hope it comes back in the next "sitting".

* This is really turning into "the weaver does what she wants" style. The color/number changes are abrupt; the pattern threading changes are abrupt, and in the past, even the lifting changed abruptly. I'm not sure if this is conducive to crating attractive (flowing, i.e. styles I tend to prefer,) pieces to sell. I realize like realism vs post-Impressionist/abstract, it's a matter of taste. But the pieces coming off this warp will retain this fragmented look. 

* Having said that, for discipline/learning as well as for a kind of visual cohesion, I'm trying to make/weave drafts with some continuity. For e.g. if a draft's last pattern shed has 4 and 5 up, I'll choose as the next draft something starting with 4 and/or 5, or 3 or 3+4, or 5 or 5+6 up. I haven't fully understood how to do this with ease yet, but on screen, drafts must look OK lined up in succession. 

* I have at least two other warps to be woven in tied unit. I may consider a more flowing pattern shaft threading next. But, if the threading and lifting flow, will the color/number changes in the thread look more disjointed?

Conundrum: (Read this only if you are as interested in tied unit weaves as I am; otherwise, skip to the last paragraph, or better yet, go do something that engages your mind!)
In my current project, this is the minimum unit of required lifting, ("repeat" in weaving lingo), which makes the cloth's weave structure "tied unit weave". (I think "three-tie unit weave" to be precise, because I'm using three shafts, 1, 2 and 3, to tie down.) In a real draft, I have multiples of these repeats all the way, and all my drafts end with a pattern lift with 2 up so I can move on to the next draft. 
In the two above examples, I'm lifting no pattern shafts. This can be woven as is, and it makes a cloth mostly warp-colored on one side, weft-colored on the other, can highlight the tie-down pattern, something else I'm interested in, but we'll ignore this today.
Usually I include pattern shafts to lift, which are for appearance/patterns you see right away rather than the structure which, well, keeps all the threads together in the cloth. Here I lifted Shaft 6 twice, and 7 and 8 twice after that. I had imagined, because tie-down shafts were lifted 1-2-3-2, I could weave forwards or backwards using the same draft files as long as I remembered to insert a pattern shed lifting Shaft 1. So:
The purple picks show the last repeat of the draft without the pattern picks. Next I reversed the order in green. Then I inserted the pattern shed lifting 1 in red, which must be sandwiched between tie down sheds, in orange, which are either 1+2+3 or 4+5+6+7+8+9, alternately. And therein lies the problem: I can't just flip the drafts and weave; I must alternate the tie down shafts. And it's much easier on the eyes to make up a new draft. It took me a few days, even with the weaving software screen staring at me, to see exactly how this (didn't) work!

The truth is, if I wove either of the tie down sheds twice in a row, they may not show up glaringly in the finished cloth, but I'd know, and now you would, too.

* * * * *

I'm riding this momentum in the coming weeks; eight sitting should complete one scarf. Stella could tell I have been weaving from my posture. (She adopted some of my violet cauliflowers.) It's nice to recall weaving helps the thinking as much as the other way around.

On the other hand, the season is changing, and I love when my mind obsesses with finding/trying new recipes, making the most of the latest produce to return to supermarket shelves. And that propels me outside, when the weather is cooperative.

4 comments:

Leigh said...

I always love seeing potted seedlings. I have some too, in hopes they'll prosper in our greenhouse this winter.

Your pieces are lovely. The color choices are glorious and it appears your "on the spot" weft selection method is working well. You blogged about the difficulty of "random" awhile back, but with this post I'm thinking, maybe "random" is the wrong word. Maybe "spontaneous" is more appropriate because the result is a visually intriguing presentation that looks like it was extremely complicated to plan. The secret is you're weaving by inspiration!

I really relate to your statement about not grasping all the information for a project. I'm in the same boat, although I'm working with a different structure and only sampling. I say "only" but sampling is such a vital part of the process. I'm thinking part of my problem is that each sample is small, and with so many of them I feel like I have a hard time retaining specifics about each one. Once my sampler is off the loom, I think my next step will be to pick out the ones that interest me most and make some small projects to explore and understand them more.

That said, I'm thinking your drafts might translate nicely to crackle.

Meg said...

Hi, Leigh. I'm all for making things looking like a complicated plan when it isn't. :-D You may be right that "random" is the wrong word, and "spontaneous" more accurate. Either way, they still feel rather foreign to me.

I've been struggling to understand the nitty gritty of your recent posts, and have pulled out my Strickler to learn Crackle, but you know me and "reading" about weaving; it doesn't happen until I try it on a loom. I will have to put on a sample warp on the Klik, perhaps soonish.

Leigh said...

I agree about 'random' and 'spontaneous.' Sometimes the words aren't quite adequate.

Of Crackle, I have to admit I was clueless until I started trying to work it out on a loom. I can read the words about it, but couldn't form a corresponding mental image to help me understand. And I struggled a lot with those first experiments. The whole point of blogging about it is to help me understand by explaining in my own words; so if it doesn't make sense to anyone else, I'm not surprised!

The range of possibilities with Crackle is huge; so many ways to push the boundaries. I can't see myself making a lifetime study of it, but I can see why people do. Given how limited my weaving time is, I suspect it will keep me engaged for quite awhile.

That said, a sample warp on your Klik would be a lot of fun! You're still dealing with pattern wefts and ties. Very fun to play around with.

Meg said...

Ah, you and me both, learning from experimenting. I didn't realize crackle was a tied weave until I started reading Strickler. It appears far more complicated than the tied unit weave I'm engaged in.

"The whole point of blogging about it is to help me understand by explaining in my own words; so if it doesn't make sense to anyone else, I'm not surprised!" Totally agree. In my writing, I had to determine where to start, i.e. do I want to explain it so non-weavers will understand it? Weavers who have no knowledge of, say, Summer & Winter? And in the end, in order to avoid making every post War and Peace, I had to settle on weavers who know something about tied unit/S&W, so that the information will be useful to me when I revisit the posts. If I ever do, because I tend to relearn anew every time, but never mind. :-D